“HUMAN FACTOR IN LANGUAGE” AS A SCIENTIFIC CONSTRUCT IN THE THEORY OF ARGUMENTATION

“HUMAN FACTOR IN LANGUAGE” AS A SCIENTIFIC CONSTRUCT IN THE THEORY OF ARGUMENTATION

Author:  N.S. Barebina, V.E. Glyzina, N.E. Gorskaya

Affiliation:  Baikal State University

Abstract:  The article deals with the linguistic component of the argumentation theory. On the example of a number of works it is demonstrated that the major linguistic trends are presented in argumentation study, and the category of «the human factor in language» is actively involved in the analysis of interactional aspects of the argu-mentative practices. This allows us to claim that the human factor plays the role of a scientific construct, which is methodologically consistent with the basic approaches of the study of argumentation.

Keywords:  argumentation, reasoning, linguistic trends, the human factor in language, linguistic and cognitive studies.

References: 

Baranov A.N. Lingvisticheskaya teoriya argumentatsii (kognitivnyy podkhod): dis. … d-ra filol. nauk. M.: Institut russkogo yazyka, 1990.
Bryushinkin V.N. Kognitivnyy podkhod k argumentatsii // RATsIO.ru. 2009. № 2. URL: http://www/ratio.albertina.ru./Ratio_ru/ archive/2009_1 (data obrashcheniya: 12.06.2016).
Eemeren F.Kh. van., Grootendorst R. Rechevye akty v argumenta-tivnykh diskussiyakh. SPb.: Vasil'evskiy ostrov, 1994.
Kolmogorova A.V. Mesto i rol' argumentatsii v kommunikativno-kognitivnykh protsessakh // Kontseptual'naya sistematika argumentatsii / G.M. Kostyushkina, A.V. Kolmogorova, N.S. Barebina, S.Yu. Dashkova, E.O. Il'icheva. M.: FLINTA: Nauka, 2016. S. 93-170.
Anscombre J.-C. L'argumentation dans la langue / J.-C. Anscombre,
O. Ducrot, 3e éd. Bruxelles : Pierre Mardaga éditeur, 1995.
Brockriede W.E. «Where is argument?» // Journal of the American Fo-rensic Association. 1975. № 11. P. 179-182.
Coulter J. Elementary Properties of Argument Sequences // Interaction Competence. N.Y.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990. P. 181-203.
Crawshay-Williams R. Methods and Criteria of reasoning: An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1957.
Dessalles J.-L. A computational model of argumentation in everyday conversation: a problem-centred approach / Computational Models of Ar-gument Proceedings of COMMA 2008. P. 128-133. Amsterdam: IOS Press. URL: http://www.enst.fr/~jld/papiers/pap.conv/Dessalles_07111264.pdf. (Data obrashcheniya 14. 05. 2016).
Ducrot O. Les modificateurs déréalisants // Journal of Pragmatics, 1995. № 24. P. 145-165.
Fogelin R.L. Understanding Argument: An Introduction to Informal Logic. N.Y.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978.
Gilbert M.A. Coalescent Argumentation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997.
Guillem S.M. Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: or-ganizing knowledge in political communication // Discourse & Society. 2009. Vol. 20 (6). P. 727-746.
Haack S. Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Hutchins E. Distributed cognition // The International Encyclopedia of the Social and behavioral Sciences. 2001. P. 2068-2072.
Lo Cascio V. Grammatica dell'argomentare: strategie e strutture
[A grammar of arguing: Strategies and structures]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1991.
Mercier H. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory / H. Mercier, D. Sperber // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2011. Vol. 34 (2). P. 57-111.
Muntigl P. Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing /
P. Muntigl, W. Turnbull // Journal of Pragmatics. 1998. № 29. P. 225-256.
Naess A. Communication and Argument. Elements of Applied Seman-tics / Translated from the Norvegian by A. Hannay. Oslo: Allen & Unwin, 1966.
O’Keefe D. Persuasion: Theory and Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, 2002.
Perelman Ch. The New Rhetoric. A treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.

Pages:  701-709