Tambov
SCIENTIFIC SERIES
“COGNITIVE STUDIES OF LANGUAGE”

MULTIMODALITY OF DISCOURSE AS THE BASIS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY COGNITIVE RESEARCH

MULTIMODALITY OF DISCOURSE AS THE BASIS OF INTERDISCIPLINARY COGNITIVE RESEARCH


Author:  L.A. Manerko

Affiliation:  Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract:  During the last decades of cognitive-communicative linguistics more attention is paid to multimodality as forms representing information in discourse. In the history of multimodality study we can find sociosemiotic, interactional and cognitive-semiotic approaches. The cognitive-communicative linguistics represents the typology of discourse knowledge dependent on the purports of linguistic personality addressing particular audience, taking into account socio-cultural, historical and other factors, necessary to convey new types of knowledge. This perspective of cognitive research is crossdisciplinary and is based on the human role in language.

Keywords:  discourse, multimodality, social context dependence, types of discourse, scientific discourse, knowledge structures

References

Gvishiani N.B. Yazyk nauchnogo obshcheniya: Voprosy metodologii / Izd. 2-e. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2008.
Elizarova G.V. Kul'tura i obuchenie inostrannym yazykam. SPb.: KARO, 2005.
Kibrik A.A. Mul'timodal'naya lingvistika. URL: http://iling-ran.ru/kibrik/Multimodal@Cog_Studies_2010.pdf
Kubryakova E.S. Evolyutsiya lingvisticheskikh idey vo vtoroy polo-vine KhKh veka (opyt paradigmal'nogo analiza) // Yazyk i nauka kontsa KhKh veka: sbornik statey. M.: In-t yazykoznaniya RAN; Izd-vo RGGU, 1995. S. 144-238.
Manerko L.A. Spetsial'nyy tekst kak stupen' formirovaniya no-vykh tipov znaniya // Terminologiya i znanie: materialy II mezhdunar. simpoziuma. M.: Azbukovnik, In-t rus. yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova,  2010. S. 128-141.
Manerko L.A. Sotsioobuslovlennost' i mul'timodal'nost' dis-kursa kak osnova dlya predstavleniya novykh tipov znaniya // Kruglyy stol. M.: RGGU, 2015 (v pechati).
Manerko L.A. Struktury znaniy, predstavlennye v khudozhestven-nom i akademicheskom diskursakh // Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 22: Teo-riya perevoda. 2013. № 1. S. 100-118.
Manerko L.A., Sharapkov A.N. Tri organizuyushchikh printsipa opi-saniya kontseptualizatsii termina v kognitivno-kommunikativnom terminovedenii // Terminologiya i znanie: materialy 4-oy mezhdunar. konf. M.: In-t rus. yazyka imeni V.V. Vinogradova, 2014. S. 110-122.
Augustyn R. Multimodality in Science Communication: How to create a Successful Blend // 2nd Conference of the International association for Cognitive Semiotics. 20-22.06.2016. Poland, Lublin: UMCS, 2016. P. 42-43.
Augustyn R., Mierzwinska-Hajnos A. Blending multimodal inputs // 2nd Conference of the International association for Cognitive Semiotics.
20-22.06.2016. Poland, Lublin: UMCS, 2016. P. 36-37.
Belucci F., Caravà M., Cristally C. Peircean Cognitive Semiotics // 2nd Conference of the International association for Cognitive Semiotics.
20-22.06.2016. Poland, Lublin: UMCS, 2016. P. 27-35.
Bonacchi S., Karpinski M. Remarks about the use of the term “multi-modality” // Journal of Multimodal Communication. 2014. Vol. 1. P. 1-7.
Chafe W. Some things that narratives tell us about the mind // Narrative thought and narrative language / Ed. by B.K. Britton, A.D. Pellegrini. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990. P. 79-98.
Halliday M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar. L.: Edward Arnold, 1985.
Kress G. Literacy in the new media age. L.: Routledge, 2003.
Kress G., Leeuwen van T. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. L.: Edward Arnold, 2001.
Kõvecses Z. Metaphor: a practical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2011.
Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective / Ed. by M.A.K. Halliday, R.A. Hasan. Geelong, Victoria: Dea-kin Univ. Press, 1985. P. 1-49.
Leeuwen van Theo. Ten Reasons Why Linguists Should Pay Attention to Visual Communication // Discourse and technology: Multimodal Dis-course Analysis / Ed. by Ph. Le Vine, Ron Scollon. Washington: Georgetown Univ. press 2004. P. 7-19.
Le Vine Ph., Scollon R. Discourse and technology: Multimodal Dis-course Analysis / Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. press 2004. 
O'Halloran K.L. Multimodal Analysis and Digital Technology // Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory and Practice / Ed. by A. Baldry,
E. Montagna. Campobasso: Palladino 2009. URL: http://multimo-dalanalysis-lab.org/_docs/Multimodal%20Analysis%20and%20Digital%20Technology.pdf
O'Halloran K.L. Systemic functional-multimodal discourse analysis (SF-MDA): constructing ideational meaning using language and visual
imagery // Visual Communication, 2008. № 7 (4). R. 443-475. URL: http://vcj.sagepub.com/content/7/4/443
Sager S.F., Bührig K. Nonverbale Kommunikation im Gespräch. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 70 (OBST). Duisburg, 2005. P. 19-47.
Stec K., Huiskes M. Co-constructing referential space in multimodal narratives // Cognitive Semiotics 2014. 7(1). P. 31- 59.
Tylén K., Weed E., Wallentin M., Roepstorff A., Frith Ch. Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind & Language, 2010. 25(1). P. 3-29.
Yu Ning. Beijing Olympics and Beijing Opera: A multimodal metaphor in a CCTV Olympics commercial // Cognitive Linguistics, 2011. № 22-3.
P. 595-628.

Pages:  720-730

Back to the list