SCIENTIFIC SERIES
“COGNITIVE STUDIES OF LANGUAGE”
Author: Francisco Jose Ruiz De Mendoza Ibanez
References:
Attardo, S. (2000). Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 793-826.
Claridge, C. 2011. Hyperbole in English. A Corpus-based Study of Exaggeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H., & Gerrig, R. (1984). On the pretense theory of irony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 121-126.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The Way we Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Grady, J. (1999). A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. In R. W. Gibbs & G. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, 101-124. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1(1): 39-74.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona Sanchez & F. J.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (Eds.) Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View, 103-124. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, F. & Galera A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A Linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wilson, D. (2013). Irony comprehension: A developmental perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 59(A): 40-56 Wilson, N. L., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31: 721-731.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Explaining irony. In D.
Wilson, & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance, 123-145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pages: 52-56