Author: S.I. Krassa
Abstract: The author proposes discourse dimension of the social dialect. The dimension is based on the specific character of the text vocabulary. The monovocabulary and polyvocabulary varieties depending on the type of vocabulary inlaid into the text sociolect have been advanced.
Keywords: social dialect, discourse dimension, monovocabulary/ polyvocabulary discourse, inlaid discourse.
References:
Bakhtin M.M. Voprosy literatury i estetiki. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975.
Bell R. Sotsiolingvistika: M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya, 1980.
Volkogonova A.V., Kalugina E.N., Krassa S.I. Karnavalizatsiya kak teleologiya yazykovogo substandarta // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. №7 (25). Ch.II. 2013. S. 61-64.
Karasik V.I. O tipakh diskursa // Yazykovaya lichnost': institutsional'nyy i personal'nyy diskurs: Sb. nauchn. trudov. Volgograd: Peremena, 2000. S. 5-20.
Krassa S.I. Lingvokontsentry v aspekte sotsiolingvistiki i metapoetiki // Metapoetika: Sbornik statey nauchno-metodicheskogo seminara «Textus». Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2008. Vyp. 1. S. 61-65.
Larin B.A. K lingvisticheskoy kharakteristike goroda (Neskol'ko predposylok) // Larin B.A. Istoriya russkogo yazyka i obshchee yazykoznanie. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1977. S. 189-199.
Lurkomor'e. URL: https://lurkmore.to
Manaenko G.N. Oslozhnennoe predlozhenie v yazyke i rechi: Ocherki po teorii i metodologii issledovaniya. Stavropol': Izd-vo SGU, 2003.
Pages: 902-906